Elfin’s wishes about Leaders & The Innovative Business of Harmony (for everyone) March 24, 2011
Posted by Karen in economy, education, life, thoughts on product/service innovation, world problems.Tags: business, education, innovation, leadership, peace, politics, risk taking, social cohesion, World Peace
add a comment
Rubberband connection just snapped; post gone into oblivion-space. This is my n-th attempt connecting to the internet. It often makes me wonder about quality. Small things such as a broadband connection does offer one an inherent idea into how a business is run. And definitely businesses, for that very matter, is very dependent on small things like product and service quality. We can’t run away from the usual consumer expectations. The same could be said about leaders. They cannot overlook small issues. They all add up and it shows by the end of the line. People’s needs come from the tiniest of things. The same applies to designing any product or service. The idea is very much similar.
Been looking around on the internet and read the papers. Not that I enjoy politcs that much but because it hangs on to everything one does in an urban place and indeed in any part of the world. I can’t run away into an no man’s island and dream all the ideas without knowing the practical facts of politics, no matter how much I dislike it. So I have been dwelling in it in a diplomatic way, asking questions.
The problem of politics in the way of innovation
In every part of the advanced world, the world ‘innovation’ has become even a larger buzz word. Talk is easy, but where is the nice cosy dinner? I often thought our innovative ideas must come from people serious in true designs in different aspects of thought, service and products.
Idealistically, I do not want any part of politics to run in any innovative endeavours. I believe it spoils both time and effort which could have been better placed for designing up policies or products for a better lifestyle. Something that is comfortable, sustainable and doesn’t waste resources. Such ideation of concepts can only come in free when the mind is pure and free. I don’t see original design solutions coming from a corrupt mind, because a messy mind cannot solve problems.
The problem with many innovators, I find is socialising. Quiet innovators simply suffer. Quiet innovators who are short of politicking skills suffer more. But ironically very good innovators are usually born introverts. So this could be a great loss not only to such innovators but also to us too. No one benefits from this kind of loss.Leaders around the world have changed faces these few years. With constant natural calamities happening these months, I cannot but think that leaders need a new set of qualities to keep different social economic factors in good balance. To add on, the general election appears to be around the corner makes me think about leaders. Not just leaders of political parties but more so on leaders in general ‘cos every line of industry plays a part in designing a harmonious, interesting and positive world. Certain traditions are worthy to keep while certain areas needs to be changed depending on the culture and the current situation. One group of thinking may not run feasible in another. But there is always a general rule that works for all. But somehow there are always leaders who choose to sacrifice certain areas.
Honestly, I have only recently catching up with the latest events and candidates. I do not have any political preference. i only want good leaders lead by a great leader. Someone who has an impeccable logic, innovative ideas, dare to spit guts into the face of obstacles of any kind and deliever us a sustainable life without having to worry about any kind of problems pertaining to life. We do need people with the creativity and the depth to produce innovative solutions, not to merely follow what others are doing. We need experts in the right ministries and I am hoping we have these leaders standby. Not just academically bright, its about being brilliantly talented. In dire times, the great leader must be able to deliver the chops against deals that do not benefit citizens. We are a tiny city state. And by that the leadership character cannot be as small as the size of our country (Singapore).
Social-economic cohesion :
From transportation to medical; from education to entertainment; from business to commerce and other social economic problems pertaining social cohesion that keeps every race sane are only some of the major issues. Ignore this at one’s own peril. Racial harmony, national harmony as well as keeping social status of various groups democratically are just some of the major aspects. I was told at some point that I overestimate the power of education that it could control social minds. Frankly I still couldn’t understand how education could not do so. I have always thought that education can control minds and the way a society functions. Education can also make or break social cohesion amongst different peoples, race, economic status and all. Education includes not only the learning of skills but also moral character and the formation of one’s mind. Education may not necessary be from schools, colleges and universities. It could be your social environment. They all contribute to how a mind works. It is, in my opinion, the greatest tool to handle any problems.
What would be horrifying is to allow the wrong education system in place that brain washes people into dogmatically stuck onto one form or regidly believes in only one line of thought about what success is. For example, a society that only focuses on materialism and financial success usually hinders other beautiful thoughts of wonder such as innovation in other areas in the arts, humanities etc in the purest form. The idea of putting money as the centre of the success universe has potentially dire consequences; usually results in the form of social unrest in the form of meanacing fight for money and status. Other breeds of hypocrisy might emerge.
Branding is vital for you and me; branding is vital for every establishment.
The same could be said of any organization. You read the face of the business, and you set an image. That image is sustained by yourself, your colleagues from your business partners down to the your pet dog that runs the business logo image. The fact is, if you don’t deliver to what you’ve promised, then your customers will go. And you have to please people. You can’t do it for all, but at least you must do it for a large majority. If you can’t, then its time to change business whatever business you are in.Or you will be out.
‘Swarm of flies’ can kill your image. Certain risk-taking is simply not worth it.
Sometimes problems could smell from afar before they start to stink. Sometimes we need to let in a swarm of flies because the climate has changed and we need a huge swat to swat them after they fly in. Hell is when and how much can we tolerate flies. Problems sometimes can be sorted out by allowing the problem to grow a little bigger before solving them. It can sometimes be eradicated better since all the baddies have been lured out to the open. I notice that some policies are done this way.However it really depends. Certain risk taking may not be well worth the swat. Your swat may not be big enough or your force is not huge enough. Then all the flies will fling in and before you know it, they breed and just gotten bigger. In this case, you’ll have a looming problem that is almost unstoppable.
Better network for assistance.
We will always have problems. Large or small, national or international. We will, at certain points in time, need help. When help is offered, and problems solved, then will there be less loopholes for pending trouble to appear. What I would like to think is that there are leaders who could make sure that help is available when we need one. Designing such access to assistance without any sort of red tape needs creativity. When we do not find a good leader in our area, there should be an alternative for us to move across the restricted boundaries to seek remedy beyond boundaries of any kind.
Impending problems would be the further widening of the rich-poor gap due to the global inflation as well as a large disparity in educational qualifications and wealth. When the poor fails to make ends meet despite hard work, and when policies don’t work to bring in jobs; then we will have a mess. It is already happening everywhere and the trend is towards chaos. Many areas of chaos comes from the point of misunderstanding cultures. Yet we still do it. I find that such mistrusts and disappointments can raise to the kind of hatred that is often being underestimated. And that is really being shortsighted.
I’ll stop here for now. — Karen Fu
Social media – the importance of patience and positiveness -2 January 4, 2010
Posted by Karen in life, simple philosophy on life.Tags: patience, postiveness, social media
add a comment
Just as I was going to start my day, I received a reply from this person who seem to be bending the facts. How could a student know about the conversation details if the person had kept quiet? It makes no logical sense but nonetheless I just move on but I made a simple reply on 2 main pointers:
Namely (i) positiveness (ii) attitude towards online communication to people whom we may not know.
I think these 2 important pointers are worth mentioning here for productive social media interaction.
To me being positive is to accept both the so-called negatives and the positive. I think this is the way of understanding what happiness is. One can’t be doing good without seeing the reality of life.
In the real world, to be able to empathise & genuinely radiate positively to help, one must accept both positive & non-positive areas. To me, avoidance from the so-called ‘negative’ is itself a negative action; as you fail to read what sadness and disadvantaged is. This is inherently a negative personal trait that has other implied values of the person. If you fail this, how can you understand what is needed to make a service or product useful and thus bring happiness to the people ?
Even if I do not like a person, I wouldn’t go to the extent of blocking him/her unless if it were the case of spamming/verbal abuse/online harassment/negative attacks. In a liberal society practicing democracy, one has to be entirely receptive to different kinds of thoughts and perspectives. I may dislike a certain person/ view, and will unfollow the person. But blocking is really a hostile act.
In the case of online communications, I think words are seen seriously in light of personal respect based on cultures. If we do not treat one another properly, we are not doing social media a good deal. While online media is a casual form of communication, it does involve respect. Relationship rifts are a result of this kind of disrespect. Its actually the same for offline communications too. Actually I should have added on these chunks in my reply. But since it was supposed to be the last and I made an addtional reply to this person’s email, I didn’t.
If respect for cultures were present, those words shouldn’t have used online in the first place. And if this person had genuinely see online communications as causal, this person shouldn’t have acted against what this person had written. It just doesn’t make sense. What seems to be even clearer now is that words are bent. If I had not been positive, there wouldn’t be a lot done. The energy wouldn’t have radiated in other areas. Being silently positive is a different form of positive energy from this person’s preference of loud positiveness that shows immediate visible actions. Clearly this person is actually unreceptive and impulsive to take on anything that is ‘different.’
What I did also mention in my reply to this person is that at times this person’s perceptions online of others may be wrong and what I’ve assessed may also be wrong too. Until you meet the real person in reality, no one is 100% sure that their judgements are right. Based on this assumption alone, this person is inherently a negative person.
Assuming quiet people do not do big things is another bias. People who are quiet sometimes do far more and achieve more. They may not be gaining reputation loud on TV shows, advertisements like this person wants to do; they are a source of positive energy that a good person will normally acknowledge and accept without bias.
Going about it loud is a style but please do not disregard silent styles. The contributions are usually far more powerful and long lasting.
Social media – the importance of patience and positiveness January 4, 2010
Posted by Karen in life, simple philosophy on life.Tags: patience, positiveness, social media
add a comment
Its a black comedy; almost a white tragedy. Maybe it isn’t and the whole social media communication could just be that : intended meaness. But I was thinking about this particular person on this particular social media platform, who started off linking up with me in a positive tone, reaffirming all the positiveness that my clarifications were well regarded; only to end up with me receiving a good numner of sacarctic communications. That is exactly how a fight would start: oversensitivity and a lack of tolerance. On the flipside, perhaps its just that the person had suffered from a very bad experience before. I had always suspected this person to have some kind of problems. I earnestly think so from the start. But I had not bothered about it because we went on very well and it seemed that a great long distance friendship had blossomed. So I took the initial bad impression off. On a few occassions I had felt I had offended this person and out of worry, emailed/Direct Message off clarifications. Once I was asked when my birthday was and I accidentally hit the wrong key. I quickly corrected it and did a resend. I sensed the person didn’t like it and passed some remarks off to me that I was ‘an old pig’ and ‘an old sister’ in mandarin pinyin. I was offended. Then again, the person said the wrong keys were hit too. I accepted the reasoning considering the fact the person wasn’t a native speaker and a foreigner to the language. Soon I found that this person appeared to do a positive action before making a negative one. One example was this person said it was fine to clarify, then blocked me off from one of the social media I was on. Immediately I took offence as I was invited by this person in the first place and that I did make it sincerely clear that I did made a typo.
I had made clarifications before to a lot of people before due to typos/terse lines due to the fact I was hurrying my emails. Most of them took it positively except for 1 whom didn’t even reply me. This person is my 2nd ‘offended one’ and the reaction has been really very poor. The latest negative communication was done by the person’s student, who seemed to have been told of the whole online communication process by this person. It made me think and reassess this person again. It does reaffirm me of the bad impression of this person. I had thought about it carefully and emailed this person one last email as I just felt that all this is such a shame.
Internet communications should be positive and when you say so you should mean so too. Whatever role one plays online or offline shows explicitly clear the kind of person you are. I usually am not bothered about criticisms and debates. But I do mind attacking ones that are destructive. Any remarks should be done with consideration because you want to improve relationships with people. Only via this way, we can foster a positive participation globally.
Just thought I should write this in. Its sombre post on an elfin’s site, but once in a while; there should be some serious tone posts here on issues that are actually important. And that reference is ‘patience + positiveness’
PS: this person’s negative rejection genuinely left me no choice. But I hope such events will never happend again!
PPS: maybe I should not even done the last email to this person !!







